Background: What Are Stabilized Austenitic Stainless Steels?

Standard 304 and 316 austenitic grades suffer from sensitization — the precipitation of chromium carbides (Cr₂₃C₆) at grain boundaries when heated between 425 °C and 870 °C. This depletes chromium near the grain boundary and causes intergranular corrosion (IGC) in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of welds, also known as weld decay.

The stabilized grades solve this by adding an element that binds carbon more strongly than chromium does. Carbon bonds preferentially to the stabilizer — keeping chromium in solid solution and preserving corrosion resistance through and after welding. Three main stabilized grades exist:

All three are fully austenitic, non-magnetic in the annealed condition, and weldable without post-weld heat treatment in most applications.

Side-by-Side Chemistry: Where 347 and 348 Diverge

The table below compares AISI 347 and AISI 348 per ASTM A182 / ASTM A240. All values are maximum wt% unless a range is stated.

AISI 347 vs AISI 348 chemical composition comparison per ASTM A182
Element AISI 347 S34700 AISI 348 S34800 Engineering Significance
Carbon (C)≤ 0.08 %≤ 0.08 %Identical
Chromium (Cr)17.00–19.00 %17.00–19.00 %Identical
Nickel (Ni)9.00–13.00 %9.00–13.00 %Identical
Nb + Ta (stabilizer)≥ 10 × C (min 0.10 %)≥ 10 × C (min 0.10 %)Same stabilization ratio
Tantalum (Ta) standalone ★Not independently restricted≤ 0.10 % maxLimits Ta-182 radioactive activation
Cobalt (Co) ★Not specified≤ 0.20 % maxLimits Co-60 — primary LWR contamination source
Manganese (Mn)≤ 2.00 %≤ 2.00 %Identical
Silicon (Si)≤ 0.75 %≤ 0.75 %Identical
Phosphorus (P)≤ 0.045 %≤ 0.045 %Identical
Sulfur (S)≤ 0.030 %≤ 0.030 %Identical

★ = the only two elements where 347 and 348 differ. Grade 348 is not a higher-performance material in any general engineering sense; it carries stricter purity controls on two trace elements for one specific reason: reducing radioactive activation in neutron environments.

Key Takeaway for Engineers

If you are selecting between 347 and 348 based on mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, or fabrication behavior — there is no meaningful difference. The decision is made entirely on whether nuclear activation of cobalt or tantalum is a design criterion.

Why Tantalum and Cobalt Are Restricted in AISI 348

The Cobalt Problem: Cobalt-60 (Co-60)

Cobalt-59, the only stable isotope of cobalt, has a large thermal neutron capture cross-section of approximately 37 barns. When any component containing Co-59 is exposed to neutron flux inside or adjacent to a reactor core, the reaction Co-59(n,γ)Co-60 occurs. Co-60 is a gamma emitter with a 5.27-year half-life producing two high-energy gamma rays (1.17 MeV and 1.33 MeV).

Co-60 is the dominant source of radioactive contamination in Light Water Reactor (LWR) primary coolant systems and accounts for the majority of occupational radiation dose during outage maintenance. Even trace levels of Co-59 in large forgings — valve bodies, pump casings, flanges — accumulate significant Co-60 inventory over a 40–60 year plant lifetime. Grade 348's limit of Co ≤ 0.20 wt% balances radiological control with metallurgical practicality.

The Tantalum Problem: Tantalum-182 (Ta-182)

Tantalum-181, the only naturally occurring stable isotope of tantalum, activates to Ta-182 under neutron irradiation. Ta-182 emits gamma radiation across multiple energies and has a 114.4-day half-life — long enough to create significant shielding requirements during reactor outages. The restriction of Ta ≤ 0.10 wt% limits this activation pathway without affecting the Nb stabilization function.

Procurement Note for Nuclear Projects

For ASME Section III nuclear qualification, specify Grade 348 and require certified material test reports (CMTRs) that individually state the measured Co and Ta values. EN 10204 Type 3.1 certificates do not automatically report these values unless you contractually require it. State this explicitly in your purchase order to avoid disputes at delivery.

Mechanical Properties: Functionally Identical

Because Ta and Co serve no structural role, the elemental restrictions in Grade 348 have zero measurable effect on mechanical performance. Values below are ASTM A182 / ASTM A240 minima in the solution-annealed condition:

Mechanical properties comparison: AISI 347 vs AISI 348
PropertyAISI 347AISI 348
Tensile strength (min)515 MPa (75 ksi)515 MPa (75 ksi)
0.2% proof strength (min)205 MPa (30 ksi)205 MPa (30 ksi)
Elongation (min, 2 in.)40 %40 %
Reduction in area (min)50 %50 %
Hardness (max)217 HB / 96 HRB217 HB / 96 HRB
Density~7.96 g/cm³~7.96 g/cm³
Thermal expansion (20–100 °C)16.6 µm/m·°C16.6 µm/m·°C

Corrosion Resistance: Equal Across Common Environments

Both grades exhibit equal corrosion resistance in the majority of industrial environments. The shared niobium stabilization prevents sensitization and makes both suitable for:

Important limitation: neither 347 nor 348 contains molybdenum. In chloride-rich or strongly reducing environments, specify 316L, 317L, or a duplex grade. The PREN for 347/348 is approximately 18–20, versus 24–26 for 316L.

Test Data Note

In ASTM A262 Practice E (Strauss IGC test) and ASTM G28 (Huey test), AISI 347 and AISI 348 perform within the experimental scatter of each other. The Ta and Co restrictions in Grade 348 have no measurable effect on aqueous corrosion performance.

Welding and Fabrication

Both grades weld with the same processes and filler metals:

In nuclear applications, using standard unrestricted ER347 filler with Grade 348 base metal re-introduces cobalt through the weld deposit, defeating the purpose of specifying 348. Your Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) and Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) must address filler metal compliance explicitly.

Post-Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT)

Neither grade requires PWHT for corrosion resistance when the delta ferrite content of the weld deposit falls within 4–12 FN per the WRC-1992 diagram. Stress-relief annealing may be required by the governing code (ASME VIII Div. 1, EN 13445) based on wall thickness and service temperature — always consult the applicable code.

Forging Considerations for A182 F347 and F348

From a hot-working standpoint, both grades are processed identically. At Jiangsu Liangyi's Jiangyin facility, we produce open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings in UNS S34800 under the same parameters as 347:

The critical difference in Grade 348 production is charge chemistry and raw material traceability. To certify Co ≤ 0.20 % and Ta ≤ 0.10 %, the melt must use controlled virgin nickel and pre-screened stainless scrap. These limits cannot be corrected post-melting. PMI verification is performed at the billet stage before forging begins.

Supplier Verification

When sourcing A182 F348 forgings, require that Co and Ta content are individually measured and numerically listed on the MTC — not simply stated as "meets A182 F348." A correct MTC will show actual element readings such as: Co: 0.012 %, Ta: 0.004 %.

Applicable Standards and International Cross-References

International standard designations for AISI 347 and AISI 348
Standard SystemAISI 347AISI 348
AISI / ASTMType 347Type 348
UNSS34700S34800
European EN1.4550 — X6CrNiNb18-101.4550 (no separate EN grade for 348)
JIS (Japan)SUS 347SUS 348
Chinese GB/T0Cr18Ni11NbSpecify as UNS S34800 — no separate GB grade
ASTM forging gradeA182 Grade F347A182 Grade F348
ASTM forging — H variantA182 Grade F347HA182 Grade F348H
ASTM plate / sheetA240 Type 347A240 Type 348

The European EN system does not maintain a separate designation for Grade 348. When specifying 348 under EN standards, reference UNS S34800 alongside the applicable EN standard (EN 10088-3 for bar/plate, EN 10222-5 for forgings), and state the Co and Ta limits as supplementary purchase order requirements.

Cost and Availability

AISI 347 is a high-volume commodity grade, widely stocked. AISI 348 is a specialty product with a narrower supply base due to controlled charge chemistry and individual element certification for Co and Ta.

When Should You Specify Each Grade?

Specify AISI 348 — UNS S34800 / A182 F348
  • ASME Section III nuclear service components
  • Primary coolant loop flanges and fittings in LWR or BWR plants
  • Components exposed to neutron flux or adjacent to the reactor core
  • Any application where Co-60 or Ta-182 activation is an ALARA constraint
  • Project specification explicitly requires UNS S34800 or A182 F348
  • Research reactor internals or hot cell equipment
Specify AISI 347 — UNS S34700 / A182 F347
  • High-temperature piping outside nuclear environments
  • Heat exchangers, boiler superheaters, steam headers above 425 °C
  • Chemical process equipment where sensitization must be avoided
  • Exhaust systems and aerospace structural components
  • ASME VIII Div. 1 pressure vessels requiring stabilization
  • Cost-sensitive applications where Co/Ta limits are not required

The decision rule is simple: Is radioactive activation of cobalt or tantalum a design constraint? If yes — mandate Grade 348. If no — specify Grade 347. It is lower cost, more readily available, and performs identically in every non-nuclear application.

A Note on H Grades: F347H and F348H

Both grades are available in "H" (high-carbon) variants with carbon controlled to 0.04–0.10 % C (versus ≤ 0.08 % for standard) and minimum grain size of ASTM No. 7 or coarser. This controlled microstructure improves creep resistance at elevated temperatures. F347H and F348H are specified in high-temperature power piping (ASME B31.1 / B31.3) where the allowable stress tables show a creep advantage for H grades above approximately 550 °C. The nuclear Co and Ta restrictions in F348H are identical to standard F348.

Writing the Purchase Order

An incomplete PO for A182 F348 forgings is a common source of quality disputes. A well-specified purchase order should include:

  1. Material standard and grade: ASTM A182 / A182M Grade F348 (UNS S34800)
  2. Heat treatment condition: Solution annealed per ASTM A182
  3. Elemental restriction: Co ≤ 0.20 wt%, Ta ≤ 0.10 wt% — actual measured values to be individually reported on MTC
  4. MTC type: EN 10204 Type 3.1; or Type 3.2 if third-party witness certification is required
  5. Testing: Full heat and product chemical analysis; tensile test; hardness; IGC per ASTM A262 Practice E if code-required; UT per ASTM A388
  6. Dimensional standard: ASME B16.5 / B16.47 for flanges, or your referenced drawing and revision number
  7. Supplementary requirements: Any applicable code requirements (ASME Sec. III, PED, API, etc.) or customer-specific inspection hold points

At Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited, every shipment of A182 F348 material includes full heat analysis with Co and Ta values individually reported on the EN 10204 3.1 MTC. We hold ISO 9001:2015 certification. Third-party inspection can be coordinated upon customer request — customers typically nominate their own preferred inspection body, and we facilitate access and documentation accordingly. View full specifications, available sizes, and request a quote for F348 forgings.

Summary

Summary: AISI 347 vs. 348 at a Glance

Summary comparison table: AISI 347 vs AISI 348
FactorAISI 347 (UNS S34700)AISI 348 (UNS S34800)
Stabilizing elementNiobium (Nb)Niobium (Nb) + controlled Ta
Cobalt restrictionNoneCo ≤ 0.20 % — nuclear activation control
Tantalum restrictionPart of Nb+Ta sum onlyTa ≤ 0.10 % — nuclear activation control
Mechanical propertiesIdentical to 348Identical to 347
Corrosion resistanceEquivalent to 348Equivalent to 347
Primary applicationHigh-temp, chemical, power generationNuclear + high-temp service
Price vs. 347Baseline+10 to +25 %
AvailabilityWide — commodity, often ex-stockSpecialty — made-to-order
Typical lead time4–8 weeks6–14 weeks
ASTM forging gradeA182 F347 / F347HA182 F348 / F348H
EN equivalent1.4550 / X6CrNiNb18-10UNS S34800 (no separate EN grade)
ISO 9001:2015 Certified EN 10204 3.1 / 3.2 MTC Available Co & Ta individually reported Established 1997 25+ years forging experience 50+ countries served
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between AISI 348 and AISI 347 stainless steel?

AISI 348 (UNS S34800) is chemically almost identical to AISI 347 (UNS S34700). The only difference is that Grade 348 has two additional nuclear-specific elemental restrictions: tantalum (Ta) must be at or below 0.10 wt% and cobalt (Co) must be at or below 0.20 wt%. These limits control radioactive activation of Ta-182 and Co-60 in neutron environments. Mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and fabrication behavior are identical for both grades.

When should you specify A182 F348 instead of A182 F347?

Specify A182 F348 (UNS S34800) when the component will be used in nuclear service under ASME Section III, exposed to neutron flux, or where Co-60 or Ta-182 radioactive activation is an ALARA concern. In all other high-temperature or corrosion applications, A182 F347 is preferred due to lower cost and wider availability.

Why is cobalt restricted in AISI 348?

Cobalt-59 has a high thermal neutron capture cross-section of approximately 37 barns. Exposure to neutron flux converts Co-59 to Cobalt-60 (Co-60), a gamma emitter with a 5.27-year half-life. Co-60 is the primary source of radioactive contamination in LWR primary coolant systems and drives maintenance worker radiation dose. Grade 348 restricts cobalt to 0.20 wt% maximum to reduce this activation pathway.

Are AISI 347 and AISI 348 interchangeable?

Yes, in non-nuclear applications. Both grades have identical mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and fabrication requirements. However, 347 cannot substitute for 348 in nuclear service because it does not meet the Co and Ta restrictions required to control radioactive activation. For non-nuclear use, 347 is preferred due to lower cost and better availability.

What does A182 F348 mean?

A182 F348 refers to ASTM A182 Grade F348 — the ASTM standard governing forged stainless steel flanges, fittings, valves, and parts for high-temperature service. The F prefix denotes a forging grade; 348 identifies the stainless steel type (UNS S34800) with cobalt (Co at or below 0.20%) and tantalum (Ta at or below 0.10%) restrictions for nuclear service.

What is the UNS number for AISI 348 stainless steel?

The UNS number for AISI 348 stainless steel is S34800. The ASTM forging grade is A182 F348. The Japanese JIS equivalent is SUS 348 per JIS G4303. There is no separate European EN designation — specify UNS S34800 directly alongside the applicable EN standard with Co and Ta limits stated as supplementary requirements in the purchase order.

Sourcing A182 F348 Forged Parts?

Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited manufactures custom AISI 348 (UNS S34800) open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings — 30 kg to 30,000 kg — at our ISO 9001:2015 certified facility in Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China. Established in 1997. Co and Ta individually certified on every EN 10204 MTC. Contact us for a quotation within 24 hours.

Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited ISO 9001:2015 certified manufacturer of open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings, established 1997. 80,000 m² facility in Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China. Over 25 years of forging experience, supplying clients across 50+ countries.