Engineering Material Guide

What Is 1.4562 (X1NiCrMoCu32-28-7)?
Properties, Composition & Engineering Guide

Everything you need to know about 1.4562 super austenitic stainless steel — composition, mechanical properties, corrosion data, welding guidelines, and industrial applications.

Published: Updated: Reading time: ~14 min By: Jiangsu Liangyi Engineering Team
1.4562 UNS N08031 Super Austenitic EN 10088-3 NACE MR0175 Forging Parts

Why Engineers Specify 1.4562

When chloride concentrations climb, acid concentrations spike, or hydrogen sulfide enters a process stream, conventional stainless steels fail — sometimes catastrophically. Engineers working in oil & gas sour service, phosphoric acid production, seawater desalination, and flue gas desulfurisation routinely encounter the same shortlist of high-performance alloys. At the top of that list sits 1.4562 (X1NiCrMoCu32-28-7) — bridging the cost gap between standard super austenitics and premium nickel alloys. For engineers who need to source this grade, Jiangsu Liangyi offers custom 1.4562 forged components manufactured to EN 10088-3 and ASTM B462.

This guide covers what 1.4562 is, why its composition was engineered the way it was, how its performance compares to peer alloys, what forging this grade involves, and how to specify it correctly for critical components. Every figure cited here is derived from EN 10088-3, ASTM B625, or published corrosion testing data.

~50 PREN — among the highest for any stainless steel
6–7% Molybdenum content, key to chloride resistance
50+ Countries where this alloy grade is regularly specified
Key Takeaway

1.4562 (also registered as UNS N08031) is a nitrogen-strengthened, copper-bearing super austenitic stainless steel with 30–32% Ni, 26–28% Cr, 6–7% Mo, and ≤ 0.015% C. Its PREN of approximately 48–52 places it above S31254 (also known as 254SMO®, a registered trademark of Outokumpu; PREN ≈ 43) and 904L (PREN ≈ 36), while its cost remains 50–70% lower than alloy N10276 (sold under the Hastelloy® C-276 trade name, a registered trademark of Haynes International) for equivalent tonnage.

Alloy Designations & Cross-Reference

One of the first challenges engineers face with this material is navigating its multiple designations across different standards bodies. The alloy appears under several names depending on region, standard, and supplier convention:

Standard / SystemDesignationNotes
EN (European)1.4562 / X1NiCrMoCu32-28-7Primary designation in EN 10088-3
UNS (USA)N08031Used in ASTM B625, B462, B473
Trade names (third-party)Nicrofer® 3127 hMo, Cronifer® 3127 hMoRegistered trademarks of Thyssenkrupp VDM / Outokumpu. Jiangsu Liangyi is not affiliated with these brands.
Alternate notationsX1NiCrMoCu32.28.7 / X1NiCrMoCu32287Dot-separated and unseparated variants
ISOX1NiCrMoCuN31-27-6-0.2ISO 15510 — emphasises nitrogen content
Important — Don't Confuse with 1.4563

Some suppliers conflate 1.4562 with the related but different 1.4563 (X1NiCrMoCu31-27-4, UNS N08028), which has only 3–4% Mo versus 6–7% Mo in 1.4562. This gives 1.4563 a significantly lower PREN (~38–40) and the two grades are not interchangeable in severe chloride service. Always confirm the UNS number N08031.

Chemical Composition — What Each Element Does

Understanding the metallurgical role of each alloying element helps engineers make confident substitution decisions and interpret corrosion test data. The composition of 1.4562 per EN 10088-3 is as follows:

ElementRange (wt %)Metallurgical Role
Nickel (Ni)30.0 – 32.0Stabilises fully austenitic structure; increases resistance to reducing acids (H₂SO₄, H₃PO₄) and stress corrosion cracking
Chromium (Cr)26.0 – 28.0Primary passive-film former; raises resistance to oxidising acids and H₂S; contributes ~1.0 × Cr to PREN
Molybdenum (Mo)6.0 – 7.0Enhances pitting and crevice corrosion resistance; contributes ~3.3 × Mo to PREN — the single largest contributor
Copper (Cu)1.0 – 1.4Reduces anodic dissolution rate in dilute H₂SO₄ and H₃PO₄; critical for reducing-acid environments
Nitrogen (N)0.15 – 0.25Solid-solution strengthener; raises yield strength without reducing ductility; contributes ~16 × N to PREN
Carbon (C)≤ 0.015Ultra-low C prevents sensitisation during welding; eliminates post-weld heat treatment in most applications
Manganese (Mn)≤ 2.0Austenite stabiliser; assists nitrogen solubility in the melt
Silicon (Si)≤ 0.3Deoxidiser; kept low to avoid embrittlement at elevated temperatures
Phosphorus (P)≤ 0.020Residual; controlled to minimise grain-boundary segregation
Sulfur (S)≤ 0.010Residual; MnS inclusions are pitting initiation sites — tight control is essential
Iron (Fe)Balance (~29–37)Matrix element

"The combination of 6–7% Mo and 0.15–0.25% N gives 1.4562 a PREN that no conventional duplex or standard super austenitic grade can match at comparable cost."

Calculating the PREN for 1.4562

The Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number is the standard index for ranking stainless steels in chloride environments. The widely accepted formula is:

PREN = %Cr + (3.3 × %Mo) + (16 × %N)

Using midpoint composition values — Cr = 27%, Mo = 6.5%, N = 0.20%:

PREN = 27 + (3.3 × 6.5) + (16 × 0.20) = 27 + 21.45 + 3.20 = 51.65

In practice, values of 48–52 are consistently reported for certified 1.4562 heats, depending on the nitrogen and molybdenum content of each melt. This places it well above the PREN = 40 threshold typically required for aggressive seawater or process chloride service.

Mechanical Properties

All values below apply to the solution-annealed condition (typically 1,080–1,120 °C, water quenched), which is the standard delivery condition for 1.4562 forgings per EN 10088-3:

Yield Strength (Re)
≥ 220 MPa
Tensile Strength (Rm)
500–700 MPa
Elongation (A)
≥ 40 %
Hardness
≤ 230 HB
Impact Energy @ 20 °C (L)
≥ 100 J
Impact Energy @ −196 °C (T)
≥ 60 J

The yield strength of 220 MPa is lower than cold-worked variants of 316L or 2205 duplex — this is expected for a fully austenitic, solution-annealed microstructure with high ductility requirements. The cryogenic impact energy of ≥ 60 J at −196 °C makes 1.4562 forgings a qualified choice for liquefied-gas applications where other super austenitics fall short.

Physical and Thermal Properties for Design Calculation

PropertyValueCondition / Note
Density8.05 g/cm³20 °C, solution annealed
Elastic Modulus (E)195 GPa20 °C; ~175 GPa at 200 °C
Poisson's Ratio0.2920 °C
Thermal Conductivity12 W/(m·K)20 °C; rises to ~16 W/(m·K) at 400 °C
Thermal Expansion (CTE)14.7 × 10⁻⁶/°C20–200 °C range
Specific Heat Capacity~450 J/(kg·K)20 °C
Melting Range1,330–1,380 °CSolidus to liquidus
Design Note — CTE Mismatch

The CTE of 14.7 × 10⁻⁶/°C is approximately 30% higher than carbon steel (~11.7 × 10⁻⁶/°C). When 1.4562 forgings are mated with carbon steel flanges in thermal-cycling service, differential thermal expansion must be accounted for in stress analysis and gasket selection. This is a common oversight in mixed-material pressure system design.

Corrosion Resistance: Quantified Data

Corrosion resistance is the primary reason engineers specify 1.4562. The following performance characteristics are supported by published test data from Thyssenkrupp VDM, Outokumpu, and peer-reviewed corrosion literature:

Pitting and Crevice Corrosion

Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) in 6% FeCl₃ solution (ASTM G48 Method C): 1.4562 consistently achieves CPT ≥ 60 °C, compared with approximately 40 °C for S31254 (254SMO®) and less than 20 °C for 904L. In seawater immersion tests at 35 °C with chloride concentrations exceeding 35,000 ppm, 1.4562 shows no pitting after 60 days — conditions that cause pitting in 316L within hours.

Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)

High nickel content (30–32%) is the primary SCC inhibitor. In MgCl₂ boiling tests (the accelerated SCC screen), 1.4562 performs comparably to nickel alloys and substantially better than duplex grades. It meets the NACE MR0175 hardness limit of ≤ 22 HRC in the solution-annealed condition, qualifying it for sour service without special dispensation.

Phosphoric and Sulfuric Acid Resistance

In 60% H₃PO₄ at 80 °C, 1.4562 shows corrosion rates below 0.1 mm/year — the threshold accepted for process plant design life. In 10% H₂SO₄ at 80 °C, the corrosion rate is below 0.05 mm/year. For comparison, 904L exceeds 0.5 mm/year in the same sulfuric acid test. The copper addition (1.0–1.4%) is the key element enabling this resistance in reducing-acid environments.

How 1.4562 Compares to Peer Alloys

Material selection in corrosive service is always a trade-off between corrosion resistance, mechanical performance, fabricability, and cost. Here is how 1.4562 stacks up against the most frequently evaluated peer alloys:

Recommended
1.4562 / N08031
PREN~48–52
Mo content6–7%
Ni content30–32%
NACE MR0175Yes
Cost vs 316L3–4×
CryogenicYes (−196 °C)
904L / N08904
PREN~36
Mo content4–5%
Ni content23–28%
NACE MR0175No
Cost vs 316L2–3×
CryogenicLimited
S31254 (254SMO®)
PREN~43
Mo content6–6.5%
Ni content17.5–18.5%
NACE MR0175Yes
Cost vs 316L3–4×
CryogenicModerate
N10276 (Hastelloy® C-276)
PREN~65
Mo content15–17%
Ni content~57%
NACE MR0175Yes
Cost vs 316L8–10×
CryogenicYes

If S31254 (254SMO®) is marginal for your application — CPT is close to your operating temperature, or chloride concentration pushes against its PREN ceiling — 1.4562 is the logical upgrade before committing to N10276 (Hastelloy® C-276) pricing. If your application genuinely requires PREN > 55 or very high-temperature oxidising service, high-Mo nickel alloys such as N10276 are warranted.

Forging 1.4562: Manufacturing Process

Forging is the preferred manufacturing route for critical 1.4562 components — pressure vessel nozzles, valve bodies, pump casings, heat exchanger tube sheets, and wellhead parts. Forging breaks down the as-cast dendrite structure, closes porosity, and establishes refined grain structure that improves both mechanical properties and corrosion resistance compared to cast equivalents. For full dimensional capabilities and available product forms, see the 1.4562 forging parts specification page.

Why Forgings Outperform Castings for 1.4562 Components

Step-by-Step Manufacturing Process

01

Steel Melting and Ingot Casting

1.4562 is melted in an electric arc furnace (EAF) followed by argon-oxygen decarburisation (AOD) to achieve ≤ 0.015% C. Nitrogen is controlled to 0.15–0.25% through AOD process management. Chemical composition is confirmed by optical emission spectrometry (OES) before casting.

02

Ingot Heating and Open Die Forging

Ingots are heated to 1,150–1,200 °C before forging. 1.4562 has a relatively narrow hot-working window — work below ~900 °C is avoided to prevent cracking. Multiple heating sequences are required for large sections. Jiangsu Liangyi produces forgings from 30 kg to 30,000 kg in this grade.

03

Seamless Ring Rolling (where applicable)

For ring and flange blank geometries, seamless ring rolling after initial open die forging provides near-net shapes up to 6,000 mm outer diameter, minimising machining waste on this expensive material.

04

Solution Annealing Heat Treatment

Forgings are solution annealed at 1,080–1,120 °C followed by rapid water quenching. This dissolves any sigma phase or secondary precipitates formed during forging, restores full corrosion resistance, and achieves target mechanical properties. Approximately 1 hour per 25 mm of ruling section.

05

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)

Ultrasonic testing (UT) per ASTM A388 or EN 10228-3 is standard for all pressure-bearing forgings. Liquid penetrant testing (PT) per ASTM E165 is applied to accessible surfaces. All test results are documented in the inspection report.

06

Mechanical Testing and Certification

Tensile and impact specimens are taken from the forging at the ¼-thickness location per EN 10088-3. Hardness testing is performed per ASTM E10 (Brinell). All results are documented on EN 10204 3.1 or 3.2 mill test certificates with full heat and lot traceability.

07

CNC Machining to Final Dimensions

1.4562 machines at approximately 30–40% of the speed of 316L due to work-hardening tendency. Carbide tooling with positive rake angles and effective coolant flood is required. Final dimensional inspection is performed against customer drawings before shipment.

Welding Guidelines

The ultra-low carbon content (≤ 0.015%) is specifically designed to minimise sensitisation during welding. Unlike older high-alloy grades, 1.4562 welds do not require post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) for most applications, significantly simplifying field fabrication.

Industrial Applications

Oil & Gas — Sour Service and Subsea

Christmas tree bodies, wellhead components, valve bodies, choke valve trim, and subsea manifold forgings in H₂S-containing environments. 1.4562 meets NACE MR0175 in the annealed condition and provides superior chloride resistance versus 316L and 22Cr duplex in high-salinity brines.

Chemical Processing — Acid Service

Pressure vessel shells and nozzles, reactor heads, heat exchanger tube sheets, pump casings and impellers for phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrofluoric acid dilute solutions. The copper addition specifically targets reducing-acid environments that chromium and molybdenum alone cannot handle.

Seawater Desalination

High-pressure pump casings, impellers, and shaft sleeves for SWRO and MSF desalination plants. At seawater chloride concentrations (~35,000 ppm) and elevated temperatures in MSF evaporator trains, 1.4562 provides a PREN margin that prevents localised corrosion failures that shorten the service life of duplex or S31254 components.

Flue Gas Desulfurisation (FGD)

Absorber vessel internals, nozzle rings, pump components, and agitator shafts in wet limestone scrubbers. The combination of chloride, sulfuric acid condensate, and elevated temperature creates one of the most corrosive environments in power generation. 1.4562 is one of the few stainless grades that survives without costly lining systems or titanium.

Pulp and Paper

Digestor vessels, bleach plant equipment, and pulp washing drum shafts exposed to acidic chloride bleaching solutions (ClO₂, Cl₂, HCl). 1.4562 provides superior SCC resistance versus 316L and 2205 duplex in high-temperature chlorine dioxide bleaching stages.

Applicable Standards and Certifications

Our Company Certification

Jiangsu Liangyi Co. Limited holds ISO 9001:2015 quality management system certification. All other items in the table below are material standards, applicable codes, or inspection services we manufacture to or can arrange — not company certifications we independently hold.

Standard / DocumentTypeScope
ISO 9001:2015Company Certification (held)Quality management system — Jiangsu Liangyi Co. Limited is certified to this standard
EN 10088-3Material StandardChemical composition and mechanical properties for 1.4562 (X1NiCrMoCu32-28-7) wrought stainless steel
ASTM B462Product StandardUNS N08031 forgings and flanges — we manufacture to this specification
EN 10204 3.1Mill Test CertificateManufacturer-certified inspection document — included with every order
EN 10204 3.2Mill Test Certificate (witnessed)Third-party witnessed inspection by SGS, BV, TÜV, or Lloyd's Register — available upon request, arranged by Jiangsu Liangyi at customer's specification
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156Material Qualification StandardDefines hardness limits for sour service. The 1.4562 alloy meets these material requirements at ≤ 22 HRC when solution-annealed. This is a material standard, not a company certification held by Jiangsu Liangyi.
PED 2014/68/EURegulatory FrameworkEuropean Pressure Equipment Directive. Final compliance is determined by the equipment manufacturer (our customer) and their Notified Body. We supply documentation to support customers' PED compliance projects.
ASME BPVC Section VIIIDesign CodeUNS N08031 is listed in ASME Section II Part D. Forgings can be supplied to support ASME-coded equipment; code compliance remains the equipment manufacturer's responsibility.

How to Specify 1.4562 Forgings Correctly

A well-written purchase specification eliminates ambiguity. At minimum, specify the following:

  1. Material designation: "1.4562 per EN 10088-3" and/or "UNS N08031 per ASTM B462" (for forgings)
  2. Delivery condition: "Solution annealed and water quenched per EN 10088-3 Table 8"
  3. MTC type: EN 10204 3.1 (standard) or EN 10204 3.2 (required for PED Category III/IV or critical equipment)
  4. NDT requirements: UT per EN 10228-3 Class 3 or ASTM A388 Level C/D; PT per EN 10228-1
  5. Hardness limit: ≤ 22 HRC (237 HV) if NACE MR0175 compliance is required
  6. Dimensional standard: Reference customer drawing number and revision; specify machining allowances
  7. Third-party inspection: Specify if SGS, BV, TÜV, or Lloyd's Register witness inspection is required before shipment

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 1.4562 the same as 1.4563?
No. These are related but distinct grades. 1.4563 (X1NiCrMoCu31-27-4, UNS N08028) has only 3–4% Mo versus 6–7% Mo in 1.4562 (UNS N08031), resulting in a PREN of approximately 38–40 versus 48–52. The two grades are not interchangeable in severe chloride service. Always confirm UNS N08031 before accepting substitutions from a supplier.
Can 1.4562 forgings be used without post-weld heat treatment?
For most applications, yes. The ultra-low carbon content (≤0.015%) prevents sensitisation during welding, and PWHT is not required by EN 13480 or ASME B31.3 for field joints in this grade. However, if the welded assembly is subsequently cold-formed, or the service environment is extremely aggressive, a full solution anneal at 1,080–1,120 °C followed by water quench is recommended.
What is the PREN of 1.4562 (X1NiCrMoCu32-28-7)?
The Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) of 1.4562 is approximately 48–52, calculated using PREN = %Cr + 3.3×%Mo + 16×%N. Using midpoint composition values (Cr=27%, Mo=6.5%, N=0.20%), PREN = 27 + 21.45 + 3.20 = 51.65. This is higher than S31254 (PREN ~43) and significantly higher than 904L (PREN ~36).
Does 1.4562 comply with NACE MR0175 for sour service?
Yes — the 1.4562 alloy (UNS N08031) meets the material requirements of NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156 when in the solution-annealed condition with hardness ≤ 22 HRC (237 HV). Important note: NACE MR0175 is a material standard, not a company certification. Jiangsu Liangyi Co. Limited holds ISO 9001:2015. We can provide EN 10204 3.1 mill test certificates confirming hardness results, and can arrange third-party witnessed inspection (EN 10204 3.2) to support your NACE compliance documentation.
What is the lead time for custom 1.4562 forgings from China?
Standard production lead time for 1.4562 open die forgings and seamless rolled rings is 6–10 weeks from order confirmation, covering steel melting, forging, heat treatment, NDT, and documentation. CNC machining adds 2–4 weeks. Third-party inspection (SGS, BV, TÜV) scheduling adds 1–2 weeks. Sea freight to European or North American ports adds 3–5 weeks.
What standards apply to 1.4562 (UNS N08031) forgings?
Key standards include EN 10088-3 (chemical composition and mechanical properties), ASTM B462 (forgings and flanges in UNS N08031), EN 10204 3.1/3.2 (mill test certificates), NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 (sour service), PED 2014/68/EU (European pressure equipment), and ASME BPVC Section VIII (pressure vessels). UNS N08031 is listed in ASME Section II Part D for allowable design stress values.