Material Engineering Guide · NiCrMoV Steel Series

26NiCrMoV14-5 vs 26NiCrMoV11-5:
Which Turbine Rotor Steel Should You Specify?

A detailed engineering comparison of 1.6957 and 1.6948 — covering chemical composition, mechanical properties, section size limits, and the procurement decisions that separate a correct specification from a costly mistake.

By Jiangsu Liangyi Engineering Team · July 2026 · ~2,000 words  ·  12 min read
Grade A — Higher Nickel
26NiCrMoV14-5
EN material no. 1.6957
Body diameter ≥ 800 mm
LP turbine rotors & large shafts
VS
Grade B — Leaner Alloy
26NiCrMoV11-5
EN material no. 1.6948
Body diameter < 800 mm
HP/IP rotors & compact shafts
Engineering Summary

26NiCrMoV14-5 (EN 1.6957) and 26NiCrMoV11-5 (EN 1.6948) are both low-alloy NiCrMoV steels for turbine rotor forgings, standardised in EN 10222-5 and SEW 555. The decisive difference is nickel content: 1.6957 contains 3.40–3.80% Ni; 1.6948 contains 2.60–3.00% Ni. Higher nickel provides deeper hardenability, enabling full martensitic transformation to the centre of large sections during quenching.

Grade selection rule: Specify 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) for effective section diameters ≥ 800 mm, cold-climate applications (FATT ≤ −10°C required), and large LP turbine rotor shafts. Specify 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) for sections below 750 mm — delivering identical surface mechanical properties at 15–25% lower material cost. Both grades have a maximum service temperature of 450°C.

Both grades are manufactured and certified by Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited — ISO 9001:2015 certified, founded 1997, Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China — with EN 10204-3.1 standard on every order. EN 10204-3.2 available via buyer-arranged third-party inspection. our 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) product page

3.4–3.8%
Nickel in 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957)
2.6–3.0%
Nickel in 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948)
800 mm
Critical section diameter threshold
15–25%
Cost saving with 1.6948 on sections < 750 mm
−10°C
Axial core FATT — 26NiCrMoV14-5
0°C
Axial core FATT — 26NiCrMoV11-5
⚡ Quick Answer for Procurement Engineers

For rotor sections below 800 mm effective diameter, specify 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) — it meets the same mechanical targets at 15–25% lower material cost. For sections 800 mm and above, the higher nickel content of 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) is required to achieve full through-hardening and adequate core toughness. Over-specifying 1.6957 on smaller rotors is the single most common — and most avoidable — grade selection error we encounter on customer drawings.

01 Why These Two Grades Exist Side by Side

Both 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5 belong to the NiCrMoV family of low-alloy steels engineered for large turbine rotor shafts operating at temperatures up to 450°C. The designation logic is consistent: the number following "Ni" encodes the nominal nickel content multiplied by four — so "14" means approximately 3.4–3.8% Ni, while "11" means approximately 2.6–3.0% Ni.

Nickel is the decisive variable. It is the element most responsible for deep hardenability — the ability to transform austenite to martensite at the center of a large cross-section during quenching. A leaner-nickel grade like 1.6948 hardens fully through sections up to approximately 800 mm. Beyond that threshold, the quench front cannot penetrate to the core fast enough to prevent bainite or pearlite formation. This produces inadequate impact toughness values in the bore region of a turbine rotor — a failure mode that does not appear on a surface hardness report but shows up clearly on a Charpy specimen from the axial core position.

At Jiangsu Liangyi, we have produced over 2,000 NiCrMoV turbine rotor forgings across 25+ years of production. The practical reality of this hardenability boundary is well-established in our data, and it is the foundation of every grade recommendation we make to customers.

About this guide: Jiangsu Liangyi is an ISO 9001:2015 certified manufacturer of 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) forgings and 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) forging parts, based in Jiangyin, China. We supply turbine rotors, rings, and bars to customers in 50+ countries with EN 10204-3.1 certification as standard and third-party inspection by major international inspection bodies.

02 Chemical Composition: What the Numbers Actually Mean

The table below compares the chemical composition limits of both grades. Nickel and Chromium deserve the closest attention — they drive the most important differences in hardening behavior.

Table 1: Chemical composition — 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) vs 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) per EN 10222-5. Jiangsu Liangyi production data.
Element 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) Engineering significance
Carbon C (%) ≤ 0.28 ≤ 0.28 Identical — both balance hardness against toughness at same level
Nickel Ni (%) 3.40 – 3.80 2.60 – 3.00 The critical difference. Higher Ni in 1.6957 enables full through-hardening in sections above 800 mm.
1.6957 → large sections
Chromium Cr (%) 1.40 – 1.80 1.50 – 2.00 Slightly higher Cr in 1.6948 partially compensates for lower Ni in smaller sections
Molybdenum Mo (%) 0.30 – 0.45 0.30 – 0.50 Near-identical — both suppress temper embrittlement and improve creep strength
Vanadium V (%) ≤ 0.15 ≤ 0.15 Identical — grain refinement; both grades perform equivalently Equal
Phosphorus P (%) ≤ 0.010 ≤ 0.010 Identical tight limits — both require high-purity VCD melt to prevent temper embrittlement
Sulfur S (%) ≤ 0.010 ≤ 0.010 Identical — minimised to prevent MnS stringer inclusions in large forgings
Silicon Si (%) ≤ 0.25 ≤ 0.25 Identical — kept low for vacuum degassed quality melt
💡
The nickel effect on hardenability: Each 0.1% increase in nickel extends the ideal critical diameter (DI) by approximately 8–12 mm. The ~0.8% nickel difference between these grades shifts the effective hardenability threshold by roughly 65–95 mm of section diameter — which is precisely the engineering gap between their specified application ranges.

03 Mechanical Properties Compared

At room temperature in the quenched-and-tempered condition, both grades are designed to meet essentially equivalent minimum property targets at the surface. The divergence becomes significant only in core properties and large-section performance — which is exactly what matters for a turbine rotor.

Table 2: Mechanical properties — 26NiCrMoV14-5 vs 26NiCrMoV11-5, quenched and tempered. Minimums per EN 10222-5; typical values from Jiangsu Liangyi production.
Property 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) Notes
Yield strength Rp0.2 (N/mm²) ≥ 730 (typ. 780) ≥ 690 (typ. 750) Similar in practice; 1.6957 minimum slightly higher
Tensile strength Rm (N/mm²) 830 – 980 790 – 950 Overlapping ranges; section-size dependent
Elongation A (%, l₀=5d) ≥ 15 ≥ 15 Equal
Reduction of area Z (%) ≥ 50 ≥ 50 Equal
Charpy V impact (J, tangential) ≥ 100 (typ. 135) ≥ 80 (typ. 110) 1.6957 requires higher minimum — better low-temperature toughness 1.6957 advantage
Axial core FATT (°C) ≤ −10°C ≤ 0°C 1.6957 achieves lower FATT — critical for cold-start turbines and cold climates 1.6957 advantage
Barrel radial impact (J) ≥ 70 ≥ 55 1.6957 superior in radial direction — important for large diameter rotors
Hardness after Q+T (HB) 248 – 302 235 – 285 Comparable; 1.6957 slightly higher range
Maximum service temperature (°C) ≤ 450°C ≤ 450°C Equal

Elevated-temperature strength retention

At 380–450°C operating temperatures, both grades show similar strength retention. Neither holds a meaningful advantage over the other at elevated temperature for the same rotor geometry. The choice between them is driven entirely by section size and core toughness requirements — not high-temperature performance.

1.6957 — strength at 400°C
~81%
1.6948 — strength at 400°C
~79%
1.6957 — strength at 450°C
~77%
1.6948 — strength at 450°C
~75%

Retention figures relative to room-temperature yield strength. Values typical for mid-range Rm, quenched and tempered condition.

04 The Section Size Threshold: The Most Important Factor

The single most important variable in grade selection is the effective cross-section diameter at the location where core mechanical properties are tested. This is not necessarily the maximum outer diameter of the finished rotor — it is the diameter of the critical section through which the quench must penetrate to achieve martensite transformation at the geometric centre.

Grade selection by effective section diameter (mm)
0
500
750
800 mm
threshold
1,300
1,800+
26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) — optimal range (< 800 mm)
26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) — required range (≥ 800 mm)

Overlap zone ~750–900 mm: either grade may qualify depending on quench parameters, furnace uniformity, and OEM requirements.

Why 800 mm is not a hard line

The 800 mm boundary is a practical engineering guideline, not a sharp physical threshold. Several factors shift it in real production:

Quench method: Rotating spray-ring quenching achieves more uniform surface cooling than static immersion, effectively pushing the hardenability threshold by 50–80 mm compared to a static water quench.

Steel cleanliness: Vacuum degassed (VCD) or electroslag remelted (ESR) heats have fewer non-metallic inclusions acting as transformation nuclei, slightly improving through-hardening behavior for borderline sections.

OEM specification: Some European turbine OEMs mandate 1.6957 for all rotors above 700 mm as a conservative engineering margin, regardless of calculated hardenability. If your purchase order references a drawing with this requirement, the grade is specified — do not deviate without a formal engineering deviation approval.

The most common mistake we see: Customers specifying 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) on rotor shafts with body diameters of 400–600 mm. In these sections, 1.6948 achieves identical core properties at 15–25% lower alloy cost. We have flagged this over-specification to several European OEM customers who inherited drawings from earlier, larger-rotor projects. In every case we reviewed, the 1.6957 upgrade added measurable cost with zero measurable performance gain.

05 Decision Framework: Which Grade to Specify

Specify 26NiCrMoV11-5 · 1.6948
  • Body diameter below 750 mm
  • HP or IP turbine rotors (smaller cross-sections)
  • Rotor discs and disc packs under 800 mm
  • Cost-sensitive projects without OEM grade override
  • Replacement rotors where original drawing shows 1.6948
  • Marine applications where section size permits
Specify 26NiCrMoV14-5 · 1.6957
  • Body diameter 800 mm or above
  • Large LP turbine rotor shafts
  • Cold-climate plants: FATT ≤ −10°C required
  • OEM drawing explicitly calls out 1.6957
  • Applications requiring EN 10204-3.2 third-party inspection
  • Rotors where axial core toughness is formally tested

For complete dimensional tolerances, available bar and ring stock sizes, heat treatment records, and EN 10204‑3.1 certificate samples, see our 26NiCrMoV14‑5 open-die forging and ring-rolling product page.

Free grade consultation: If you are unsure which grade is correct for your application, send us the rotor geometry or drawing. Our metallurgical engineering team will confirm the appropriate grade and provide quotations for both where applicable — within 24 hours, at no cost. Contact us →

06 How to Select the Correct Grade — Step by Step

The following five-step process covers every grade selection scenario for 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5 turbine rotor forgings, in sequence. Earlier steps can short-circuit the process if a definitive answer is found.

  1. Step 1 — Determine the effective section diameter. Identify the diameter of the cross-section at which core mechanical properties will be tested — typically the rotor body at mid-length. This is the controlling dimension, not the maximum flange or journal OD.
  2. Step 2 — Check for OEM or contractual grade requirements. Review the purchase order, customer drawing, and project specification for any explicit material designation (1.6957 or 1.6948). If specified, that requirement governs — a formal written engineering deviation is required before any substitution.
  3. Step 3 — Apply the 800 mm threshold rule. Below 750 mm: specify 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948). Above 800 mm: specify 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957). In the 750–900 mm overlap zone: perform a Grossmann DI hardenability calculation with the agreed chemistry range, site quench method, and OEM requirements.
  4. Step 4 — Confirm FATT requirement. If the project specification requires axial core FATT ≤ −10°C — required for cold-climate installations, Northern Europe, North America, or high-altitude sites — specify 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) regardless of section size.
  5. Step 5 — Issue RFQ with full technical details. Include: effective section diameter, operating temperature, required FATT, applicable standards (EN, ASTM, or dual), third-party inspection body if required (e.g. EN 10204-3.2 third-party), and MTC type required (EN 10204-3.1 or 3.2).

06 Real-World Scenarios from Our Order Book

The following cases illustrate how grade selection decisions play out in production. Details have been anonymised but the engineering facts are drawn directly from orders we have processed.

01
Southeast Asian power plant — 350 MW steam turbine LP rotor, ∅1,100 mm
Customer's original inquiry specified 26NiCrMoV11-5. After reviewing the drawing — LP rotor body diameter 1,100 mm, axial core FATT requirement ≤ −10°C — our engineering team recommended upgrading to 1.6957. The customer's local team had not flagged the section size conflict. We supplied 26NiCrMoV14-5 with EN 10204-3.1 with EN 10204-3.1 mill test certificate. Final axial core FATT measured −22°C, well within the acceptance criterion.
→ Upgraded to 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) — correct outcome
02
European OEM — HP turbine rotor, ∅520 mm, drawing specified 1.6957
Drawing arrived with 26NiCrMoV14-5 already specified. We provided a formal assessment confirming that 1.6948 would meet all mechanical property requirements at this section size and offered a dual quotation. The customer chose to maintain 1.6957 (their OEM standard applies to all rotors regardless of diameter). We manufactured to specification as required and documented the cost analysis for their engineering team's future drawing revision review.
→ Manufactured 1.6957 per OEM specification
03
Middle East combined cycle — generator rotor shaft, ∅880 mm (overlap zone)
Borderline section size at 880 mm — inside the hardenability overlap zone. Customer had specified 1.6948. We conducted a Grossmann DI calculation using the agreed chemistry range and our spray-quench parameters. Results showed a high probability of achieving required core FATT with 1.6948, but we recommended a conservative upgrade to 1.6957 given the 30-year design life expectation and safety-critical application. Customer accepted the upgrade. Final axial core FATT was −15°C.
→ Upgraded to 26NiCrMoV14-5 for safety margin
04
North American gas compressor — turbine discs, ∅650 mm, ASTM A471 Class 10 specified
Contract required ASTM A471 Class 10 (equivalent to 1.6957 NiCrMoV range). Section review confirmed 1.6948 properties would be sufficient for the application, but the contractual requirement for A471 Class 10 could not be substituted without a formal contract amendment. We manufactured to the specified grade with dual EN/ASTM certification and recommended the customer initiate a material substitution review for future orders.
→ Manufactured to contract requirement; substitution documented for review

07 Cost Implications of Grade Selection

The price difference between 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5 forgings is driven primarily by the nickel content differential — approximately 0.7–1.0% additional nickel in 1.6957. Given nickel's market premium over the base steel price, this compositional difference typically translates to a 15–25% increase in raw forging cost when comparing equivalent geometries.

For a 10-tonne LP turbine rotor, this can represent a significant procurement cost difference. The calculation must, however, be weighed against the cost of misspecification in the other direction: an under-specified core in a large LP rotor that fails in service carries costs — turbine replacement, plant downtime, engineering investigation, and liability — that dwarf the upfront material differential many times over.

💡
Procurement tip: When issuing an RFQ for a turbine rotor forging, always include the effective section diameter — not just the overall finished dimensions. This allows the forging manufacturer to recommend the correct grade and avoids the two most common errors: under-specifying (1.6948 on a rotor that needs 1.6957) and over-specifying (1.6957 on a compact rotor that 1.6948 handles equally well). Both have real cost consequences.

08 Standards and Certification Differences

Table 3: Standards and certification comparison. Both grades manufactured and certified by Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited, ISO 9001:2015.
Standard / Document 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948)
Primary EN standard EN 10222-5, VdTÜV WB 397 EN 10222-5, VdTÜV WB 395
ASTM equivalent (approx.) A470 Class 8 / A471 Class 10 A470 Class 7 / A471 Class 8
MTC type — standard EN 10204-3.1 EN 10204-3.1
MTC type — critical applications EN 10204-3.2 (via third-party inspection) EN 10204-3.2 (via third-party inspection)
Third-party inspection bodies major international inspection bodies — all supported major international inspection bodies — all supported
Core impact specimen requirement Tangential + axial core — FATT ≤ −10°C Tangential + axial core — FATT ≤ 0°C
Dual EN + ASTM certification Available on request Available on request

From a documentation standpoint, both grades follow the same inspection and testing protocol at Jiangsu Liangyi. The key distinction on the mill test certificate is the material designation, chemical composition values, and the FATT acceptance criterion on the axial core Charpy specimen — which is 10°C more stringent for 1.6957.

09 Frequently Asked Questions

Can 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) be used as a direct substitute for 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957)?

Only if the effective section diameter is below approximately 750 mm and no contractual or OEM specification mandates 1.6957. If the drawing explicitly specifies 1.6957, a formal engineering deviation request must be submitted and approved before substitution. The axial core FATT difference — ≤ −10°C for 1.6957 vs ≤ 0°C for 1.6948 — is real and safety-critical in large rotor sections. Never substitute without a documented engineering assessment.

Is 26NiCrMoV14-5 always the better steel grade?

No. For sections below 750 mm, 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) achieves identical mechanical properties at 15–25% lower material cost. Specifying 1.6957 on a compact rotor adds cost without adding any measurable performance benefit. Grade selection means matching material to requirement — not defaulting to the highest-alloy option.

What is FATT and why does the 10°C difference between 1.6957 and 1.6948 matter?

FATT (Fracture Appearance Transition Temperature) is the temperature at which 50% of the Charpy fracture surface transitions from ductile fibrous to brittle cleavage. 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) achieves FATT ≤ −10°C; 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) achieves FATT ≤ 0°C. This 10°C difference is critical for turbines in cold climates, Northern European and North American installations, or plants that undergo cold starts — where the lower FATT of 1.6957 provides a wider safety margin against brittle fracture at the rotor bore.

What section diameter threshold determines whether to use 1.6957 or 1.6948?

The practical threshold is 800 mm effective section diameter. Below 750 mm: specify 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948). Above 800 mm: specify 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957). For 750–900 mm overlap zone: perform a Grossmann DI hardenability calculation using the agreed chemistry and site quench parameters. The 800 mm figure is not arbitrary — it reflects the hardenability difference between 3.4–3.8% and 2.6–3.0% nickel in forging-sized cross-sections.

What is the nickel content difference between 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5?

26NiCrMoV14-5 (EN 1.6957) contains 3.40–3.80% nickel. 26NiCrMoV11-5 (EN 1.6948) contains 2.60–3.00% nickel. The ~0.8% nickel difference shifts the Grossmann ideal critical diameter (DI) by approximately 65–95 mm — which is the metallurgical basis for the 800 mm section size selection threshold. Each 0.1% increase in nickel extends DI by approximately 8–12 mm.

What is the maximum service temperature for 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5?

Both 26NiCrMoV14-5 (1.6957) and 26NiCrMoV11-5 (1.6948) have a maximum continuous service temperature of 450°C. High-temperature performance is not a differentiating factor between the two grades. Grade selection is determined entirely by section size and axial core FATT requirements — not by operating temperature.

Can Jiangsu Liangyi provide dual EN 26NiCrMoV14-5 and ASTM A470 Class 8 certification?

Yes. Jiangsu Liangyi regularly produces forgings with dual EN/ASTM certification on a single mill test certificate, satisfying both 26NiCrMoV14-5 (EN 1.6957) composition limits and ASTM A470 Class 8 requirements simultaneously. Test specimen location requirements differ between EN and ASTM — both must be satisfied explicitly, not assumed equivalent. Specify dual certification clearly in the RFQ.

What are the typical lead times for 26NiCrMoV14-5 and 26NiCrMoV11-5 forgings?

Both grades are produced to order at Jiangsu Liangyi. Standard bars and ring dimensions: 4–6 weeks raw. Custom turbine rotor shafts with rough machining and NDT: 12–20 weeks depending on size and complexity. Contact sales@jnmtforgedparts.com for a geometry-specific delivery estimate — Jiangsu Liangyi responds within 24 hours.
Ready to Order or Need Technical Advice?

Get a Free Grade Assessment and Quotation

Send us your rotor dimensions and application details. Our metallurgical engineering team will confirm the correct grade and deliver a detailed quotation within 24 hours.

sales@jnmtforgedparts.com  ·  +86-135-8506-7993  ·  ISO 9001:2015  ·  Quote within 24h