Quick Answer

P245GH (1.0352) is the correct choice for the vast majority of pressure vessel and heat exchanger applications due to lower carbon equivalent (~0.34 vs ~0.42), better weldability, wider material availability, and lower cost. Specify P265GH (1.0425) only when EN 13445 or ASME design calculations require a minimum yield strength above what P245GH allowable stresses provide — typically in thick-wall components (tube sheets >150 mm, boiler drums, large-bore flanges) where the 20 MPa advantage produces measurable wall-thickness savings. Both grades share an identical tensile strength band of 410–570 MPa under EN 10222-2:2017.

When a pressure vessel engineer opens an EN 10222-2 grade table, the choice between P245GH and P265GH can appear deceptively simple: one grade has a higher minimum yield strength. In practice, that choice ripples into welding procedure qualifications, heat treatment scope, procurement lead times, EN 10204 MTC type, and long-term creep behaviour under PED 2014/68/EU requirements. This guide works through every layer of the decision.

20 MPa Yield strength advantage of P265GH across all forging thickness bands
3–8% Typical material cost premium for P265GH over equivalent P245GH forgings
~0.34 CE Typical P245GH carbon equivalent vs ~0.42 for P265GH (IIW formula)
Scope of this guide

Data covers open die forgings and seamless rolled rings under EN 10222-2:2017. Plate and pipe product forms may carry different section-thickness rules, delivery conditions, and available sub-grades. All mechanical property values reference the standard's tables and are not guaranteed as actual test results for any specific heat.

1. What the Grade Names Mean

Both grades use the same EN pressure steel naming convention, defined in EN 10027-1:

Critically, the number denotes the yield floor, not the tensile strength. Both grades are classified as non-alloy steels — distinguishable from alloy pressure grades (e.g. 13CrMo4-5, 10CrMo9-10) by the absence of a chemical symbol in the designation.

P245GH 1.0352
StandardEN 10222-2
Re min.245 MPa
Rm range410–570 MPa
Max. temp.350°C
DeliveryN or N+T
Typ. CE (IIW)≈ 0.34
ASTM equiv.≈ A105
P265GH 1.0425
StandardEN 10222-2
Re min.265 MPa
Rm range410–570 MPa
Max. temp.350°C
DeliveryN or N+T
Typ. CE (IIW)≈ 0.42
ASTM equiv.≈ A516 Gr.60

The critical observation: both grades share an identical tensile strength band (410–570 MPa). The differentiation lives entirely in the minimum yield strength and in the manganese-driven chemistry that achieves it.

2. Chemical Composition — Where the Difference Originates

EN 10222-2:2017 — Ladle Analysis (%)
Element P245GH (1.0352) P265GH (1.0425) Engineering Significance
C — Carbon0.08 – 0.20%0.08 – 0.20%Identical — no carbon boost used
Si — Siliconmax. 0.40%max. 0.40%Identical deoxidation limit
Mn — Manganese0.50 – 1.30%0.80 – 1.40%Floor +60% in P265GH — primary strength driver
P — Phosphorusmax. 0.025%max. 0.025%Identical toughness control limit
S — Sulfurmax. 0.015%max. 0.015%Identical MnS inclusion control
Al — Aluminiummin. 0.020%min. 0.020%Grain refinement — both grades
Nb + V + Ti (sum)max. 0.05%max. 0.05%Microalloying control — both grades

P265GH achieves its 20 MPa yield advantage through a higher minimum manganese specification, not through carbon addition. This is deliberate: adding carbon to chase strength would raise the carbon equivalent (CE), worsen weldability, and reduce the suitability for the pressure equipment welding environments both grades are designed to serve.

Carbon Equivalent Explained

Using the IIW formula CE = C + Mn/6 + (Cr+Mo+V)/5 + (Ni+Cu)/15: a typical P245GH heat (1.10% Mn, 0.16% C) gives CE ≈ 0.34. A typical P265GH heat (1.35% Mn, 0.19% C) gives CE ≈ 0.42. Per EN ISO 13916, sections above 25 mm in P265GH may require preheat to 75–100°C depending on heat input and restraint — while equivalent P245GH sections frequently do not. This difference directly affects weld procedure qualification, fabrication throughput, and labour cost.

3. Mechanical Properties by Thickness

EN 10222-2 provides stepped minimum yield values for increasing thickness bands. Engineers must verify the correct row for their forging's governing section thickness.

Minimum Yield Strength Re (MPa) — EN 10222-2:2017
Thickness Range (mm) P245GH Re min. (MPa) P265GH Re min. (MPa) Advantage
≤ 16245265+20 MPa
16 – 40235255+20 MPa
40 – 60220240+20 MPa
60 – 100210230+20 MPa
100 – 160195215+20 MPa
160 – 250185200+15 MPa

The 20 MPa advantage is consistent across all practical forging thicknesses. The gap narrows slightly above 160 mm — a function of reduced through-section hardenability in both non-alloy grades following normalizing heat treatment. Jiangsu Liangyi supplies P245GH forgings across the full range from 30 kg to 30,000 kg per piece, covering all thickness bands in the table above.

Elevated Temperature Yield Strength

At 300°C, both P245GH and P265GH lose approximately 25–30% of their room-temperature yield. At 350°C, the reduction is 35–40%. Above this temperature, neither grade is appropriate for creep-controlled design; low-alloy grades such as 13CrMo4-5 or 10CrMo9-10 are required.

Impact Toughness

EN 10222-2 requires minimum Charpy V-notch impact energy of typically 27 J longitudinal at +20°C for both grades in the standard delivery condition. Lower test temperatures (–10°C, –20°C) can be specified by agreement. For pressure equipment designed for service below –10°C, fine-grain weldable steels such as P355NL or P460NL should be selected.

4. Weldability — The Most Decisive Practical Factor

In pressure equipment fabrication under EN 13445 or PED 2014/68/EU, weldability constraints frequently outweigh yield strength advantage in final grade selection. A 20 MPa yield benefit becomes counterproductive if it triggers mandatory preheat, additional qualification testing, or PWHT-induced strength recovery that erases the original advantage.

Preheat Requirements

Using the IIW carbon equivalent formula, the higher manganese floor of P265GH produces CE values that, on sections above 25 mm with moderate heat input, enter the preheat-required zone per EN ISO 13916. P245GH's typical CE of ~0.34 generally allows preheat-free welding on sections up to 35–40 mm at comparable heat inputs. The practical impact:

Shop-Floor Cost Impact

For a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with three 42 mm thick P265GH tube sheets, mandatory preheat during tube-to-tube-sheet and flange welding can represent a 10–18% increase in total welding labour cost compared with an equivalent P245GH specification — often exceeding the raw material price difference between grades on a completed vessel.

Post-Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT)

EN 13445-4 governs PWHT requirements based on section thickness and carbon equivalent — not grade designation alone. For both P245GH and P265GH, PWHT is typically mandatory for butt joints above 35 mm. The additional consideration for P265GH: its higher manganese content produces a slightly more pronounced tempering response during PWHT soaking cycles, which can reduce the as-welded yield advantage back toward P245GH levels, partially negating the original reason for the upward grade change.

5. Application Selection Matrix

The following matrix reflects engineering practice across oil and gas, power generation, chemical processing, and petrochemical industries where both grades are routinely specified for forged components.

Application / Condition
P245GH
P265GH
Shell-and-tube heat exchangers, standard service
✔ Preferred
○ Acceptable
Pressure vessel bodies, wall thickness < 40 mm
✔ Standard
○ Over-specified
High-pressure steam boiler drums, thick-wall
○ Check calc.
✔ Preferred
Valve bodies, low-to-medium pressure (< PN100)
✔ Preferred
○ Acceptable
Flanges, small bore (< DN300), standard PN
✔ Standard
✗ Rarely justified
Flanges, large bore (> DN600), heavy wall neck
○ Check calc.
✔ Consider
Tube sheets, thickness > 150 mm
○ Check calc.
✔ Preferred
Sour service — NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
✔ Lower CE preferred
✗ CE control required
Continuous service above 280°C
✗ Review creep data
✗ Review creep data
ASME dual-stamp (SA-266 / SA-105 approx. equiv.)
✔ Closer match
○ Possible by agreement

6. Procurement, MTC Verification, and Grade Substitution Risk

P245GH is significantly more common in forging inventories globally. Its wider manganese specification range (0.50–1.30%) gives steelmakers more flexibility in achieving target chemistry without special-order billets, producing faster availability from standard stock. P265GH billets require a minimum manganese of 0.80%, which narrows the melt window and can add 1–2 weeks to lead time on non-standard dimensions.

EN 10204 MTC Requirements

Whether you specify P245GH or P265GH, the Mill Test Certificate — Type 3.1 or 3.2 — must include:

Grade Substitution Warning

P245GH and P265GH are occasionally treated as interchangeable because they share the same 410–570 MPa tensile strength band. They are not interchangeable without a formal design authority drawing revision. Installing a P245GH forging in a pressure vessel calculated to P265GH allowable stresses constitutes a non-conformance under PED 2014/68/EU, EN 13445-2, and applicable notified body inspection protocols. Verify the material number (1.0352 vs 1.0425) on every MTC against the purchase specification before accepting any forging.

7. Cost, Lead Time, and Availability

P265GH carries a typical material premium of 3–8% over equivalent P245GH forgings in the same geometry and weight class. This reflects the tighter minimum manganese specification and reduced flexibility in melt chemistry. Across a multi-item heat exchanger or pressure vessel kit (tube sheets, nozzle forgings, flanges, connecting rings), the premium compounds: a vessel with €40,000 of forging content might carry an additional €1,200–€3,200 in material cost for the P265GH specification — before accounting for additional welding labour, potential new PQR costs, and extended procurement lead time.

8. Grade Selection Decision Workflow

Apply the following six-step sequence when preparing a forging specification for pressure service in carbon steel. Document each decision with reference to the applicable code clause.

1
Calculate the required minimum yield strength at design temperature from your applicable pressure code (EN 13445, PD 5500, ASME VIII Div. 1 or Div. 2). Note the required allowable stress value — f for EN 13445 or S for ASME.
2
Check whether P245GH allowable stresses cover the requirement. EN 13445-2 Annex B provides both time-independent and time-dependent (creep) strength values for P245GH and P265GH at temperature. If P245GH passes, specify it — there is no engineering justification for the higher grade.
3
Verify wall thickness adequacy. For sections above 100 mm, check the thickness-reduced yield values against the governing design equation. This is the thickness band where P265GH most frequently earns its place through measurable wall reduction.
4
Assess the weldability impact. If your fabricator's qualified Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) and associated Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) covers P245GH but not P265GH — due to different CE range, preheat class, or heat input limits — factor the cost of new qualification testing into the grade decision.
5
Confirm sour service compliance if applicable. For equipment subject to NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156, P245GH is preferred due to lower carbon equivalent and reduced HAZ hardness risk. P265GH requires chemistry confirmation from the forging manufacturer against specific NACE hardness limits.
6
Document the grade selection basis in the material selection report. Notified bodies and third-party inspectors operating under PED 2014/68/EU expect a calculation reference — the code table, the allowable stress value used, and the clause that either supports P245GH or mandates P265GH — not a narrative justification.
Sourcing P245GH or P265GH Forgings?

Jiangsu Liangyi manufactures open die forgings and seamless rolled rings in both grades, 30 kg to 30,000 kg per piece. EN 10204 3.1 / 3.2 MTC with full heat and dimensional traceability. ISO 9001:2015 certified, 27 years of experience, global supply to 50+ countries.

View P245GH Forged Parts →

9. Full Comparison Summary

Criterion P245GH (1.0352) P265GH (1.0425) Verdict
Min. yield strength ≤ 16 mm245 MPa265 MPaP265GH +20 MPa
Tensile strength range410–570 MPa410–570 MPaEqual
Typical CE (IIW formula)~0.34~0.42P245GH better
Weldability / preheat riskLower CE — generally preheat-free <35 mmHigher CE — preheat may be required >25 mmP245GH better
PWHT softening responseStandardSlightly more pronounced due to MnP245GH better
NACE MR0175 sour servicePreferred — lower CE, lower HAZ hardnessRequires chemistry control and confirmationP245GH better
Material availabilityWider billet stock — broader CE bandTighter melt spec — narrower chemistry windowP245GH better
Material costBaseline+3–8% premiumP245GH lower
Thick-wall >100 mm componentsCheck calculation — may be marginalBetter design margin — justifies specificationP265GH better
ASTM approximate equivalentA105 / SA-105A516 Gr.60 / SA-516 Gr.60Context-dependent

10. Frequently Asked Questions

Is P245GH equivalent to ASTM A105?

P245GH (EN 10222-2) is widely cited as a European functional equivalent to ASTM A105 for forged pressure fittings and flanges. Both are non-alloy carbon-manganese steels with similar room-temperature strength levels. However, they are not specification-identical: chemistry limits, impact testing requirements, and certification formats differ between EN and ASTM systems. A formal drawing revision and design authority approval is required before substituting one for the other on any PED- or ASME-coded vessel.

What is P265GH equivalent to in ASTM standards?

P265GH is generally considered comparable to ASTM A516 Grade 60 / SA-516 Grade 60 in terms of pressure vessel applications and strength level. The yield and tensile strengths are similar, but the standards differ in chemistry, impact test requirements, and quality inspection protocols. For projects requiring EN standards and PED compliance, P265GH is the correct specification; for ASME-coded vessels, A516 Gr.60/70 or A105 is standard depending on the product form.

Can P245GH and P265GH be substituted for each other?

No — not without a formal design authority drawing revision. Although both grades share the 410–570 MPa tensile strength band, their minimum yield strengths differ by 20 MPa. A vessel designed to P265GH allowable stresses cannot legally or safely use P245GH material without recalculating wall thickness. Conversely, P265GH may be used where P245GH is specified, but this represents unnecessary cost and potential weldability complications. Always verify the material number (1.0352 vs 1.0425) on every EN 10204 MTC.

Does P265GH need preheat before welding?

It depends on section thickness, heat input, and the actual carbon equivalent of the specific heat. A typical P265GH heat with CE ~0.42 (IIW formula) may require preheat to 75–100°C on sections above 25 mm under EN ISO 13916 guidance. Actual preheat requirements must be determined via the welding procedure specification (WPS) qualified by procedure qualification testing (PQR). P245GH with CE ~0.34 typically does not require preheat on sections below 35–40 mm at standard heat inputs.

Conclusion

For the vast majority of pressure equipment applications — shell-and-tube heat exchangers, standard pressure vessel shells, mid-pressure valve bodies, and small-to-medium flanges — P245GH (1.0352) delivers sufficient strength while offering clear advantages in weldability, carbon equivalent, material availability, and cost. The grade has been the preferred European pressure steel for forgings precisely because its chemistry balances strength, toughness, and fabricability at a level suited to the vast majority of real-world pressure equipment design conditions.

P265GH earns its specification in a well-defined set of scenarios: thick-wall components where 20 MPa more yield translates to measurable wall reduction, high-pressure boiler drums where the design calculation leaves no margin with P245GH allowable stresses, and large-bore heavy-flange configurations where the extra strength changes the outcome of EN 13445 calculations.

The most common specification error is selecting P265GH conservatively — without running the calculation — and then discovering at the fabrication stage that the higher CE complicates welding procedures, extends lead times, or triggers PWHT requirements that partially cancel the strength advantage. Run the design calculation first. Specify the grade the numbers require.

For custom-forged P245GH forged components — tube sheets, seamless rolled rings, flanges, nozzle forgings and valve bodies — manufactured to EN 10222-2 with full EN 10204 3.1 or 3.2 certification, visit our P245GH forged parts product page for dimensional ranges, available product forms, and technical specifications.

P245GH P265GH 1.0352 1.0425 EN 10222-2 Pressure Vessel Steel Forging Grade Selection PED 2014/68/EU EN 13445 NACE MR0175
← All Articles