⚡ Quick Answer

Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200) is the best choice for sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid environments, thanks to its unique 1.3–1.9% copper addition that no other standard Hastelloy C-grade contains. Hastelloy C276 (UNS N10276) is best for reducing environments, sour gas (NACE MR0175), and general corrosive service where broad availability matters. Hastelloy C22 (UNS N06022) is best for mixed oxidizing/reducing process streams and nitric acid service. Key data: C2000 PREN ≈ 75.8 (highest), C276 PREN ≈ 68.3, C22 PREN ≈ 65.6. In 10% H₂SO₄ at boiling, C2000 corrodes at 0.127 mm/yr vs 0.330 mm/yr for C276 — 2.6× slower.

C2000 → Sulfuric & HCl acids C276 → Sour gas & reducing service C22 → Oxidizing & mixed environments
⚙ Alloy Selection Guide · Ni-Cr-Mo Alloys

Hastelloy C2000 vs C276 vs C22:
Which Nickel Alloy Is Right
for Your Corrosive Environment?

A data-driven engineering comparison of the three most specified Ni-Cr-Mo alloys in chemical processing, oil & gas, and power generation — covering corrosion rates, PREN scores, weldability, cost, and real-world application recommendations.

PublishedJune 15, 2026
AuthorEngineering Team, Jiangsu Liangyi
Reading Time~12 minutes
UNS CoveredN06200 · N10276 · N06022
C2000 Best for sulfuric acid & mixed-acid environments
C276 Best for reducing acid + high-chloride sour service
C22 Best for oxidizing media & variable process streams
01

Why This Comparison Matters

🏭

Jiangsu Liangyi Engineering Team

25+ years of nickel alloy forging experience · Open-die forgings & seamless rolled rings · Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China

ISO 9001:2015 50+ Countries Since 1997 API 6A (per order)
Last reviewed and updated: June 15, 2026 · Corrosion data sourced from Haynes International published datasheets

Choosing the wrong nickel alloy for a corrosive service environment is not just an engineering oversight — it is a costly operational failure. A valve body specified in C276 instead of C2000 for a concentrated sulfuric acid loop can corrode four times faster, turning a five-year service life into 14 months of unplanned shutdowns and expensive replacements.

2.6×
Faster C276 corrodes vs C2000 in 10% H₂SO₄ at boiling
75.8
C2000 PREN score — highest pitting resistance of the three alloys
6yr
C2000 service life in 98% H₂SO₄ plant vs 8–12 months for 316L SS

Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200), C276 (UNS N10276), and C22 (UNS N06022) are the three most widely specified alloys in the Hastelloy C-family. All three belong to the nickel-chromium-molybdenum system and offer outstanding general corrosion resistance. Yet they differ meaningfully in composition, corrosion behavior, fabrication characteristics, and cost — differences that determine whether your equipment lasts 18 months or 18 years.

This guide is written for materials engineers, process engineers, and procurement specialists who need a defensible alloy selection backed by data. It draws on published corrosion data from Haynes International, ASTM compositional standards, and the forging production experience of Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited, an ISO 9001:2015 certified manufacturer of open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings in all three alloys.

📌
Scope Note

This comparison focuses on wrought and forged product forms. All corrosion rate data referenced is from solution-annealed material tested under laboratory conditions. Real-world performance depends on temperature, flow velocity, surface finish, and contaminants. Always perform a site-specific corrosion assessment before final specification.

02

Alloy Identities at a Glance

Before diving into data, here is a concise identity card for each alloy — what it is, why it was developed, and where it shines.

Hastelloy C2000 is a nickel-chromium-molybdenum-copper alloy (UNS N06200, DIN 2.4675) containing approximately 59% Ni, 23% Cr, 16% Mo, and 1.6% Cu, with a density of 8.50 g/cm³ and melting range of 1,357–1,388 °C. Hastelloy C276 (UNS N10276, DIN 2.4819) is a nickel-molybdenum-chromium alloy with ~57% Ni, 15.5% Cr, 16% Mo, and 3.75% W. Hastelloy C22 (UNS N06022, DIN 2.4602) contains ~56% Ni, 21% Cr, 13.5% Mo, and 3% W — optimized for oxidizing environments.
C2000 · N06200

Hastelloy C2000

UNS N06200 · DIN 2.4675 · NiCr23Mo16Cu

The newest of the three, developed by Haynes International as a single-alloy solution for both reducing and oxidizing acid environments. Its defining feature is a deliberate 1.3–1.9% copper addition — completely absent in C276 and C22 — which dramatically improves resistance to concentrated sulfuric and hydrochloric acids. Combined with 22–24% chromium (the highest of the three), C2000 offers an unmatched dual-environment performance envelope.

→ The all-rounder for mixed acid service

View UNS N06200 open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings →

C276 · N10276

Hastelloy C276

UNS N10276 · DIN 2.4819 · NiMo16Cr15W

The industry workhorse since the 1960s — the most widely used and stocked nickel alloy in the world. Lower chromium (14.5–16.5%) is offset by tungsten additions (3–4.5%) and high molybdenum (15–17%), giving exceptional resistance to reducing conditions, pitting, and crevice corrosion in chloride-rich environments. It is the default specification when engineers need a proven, broadly available corrosion-resistant alloy for reducing or sour service.

→ The proven standard for chloride + reducing service
C22 · N06022

Hastelloy C22

UNS N06022 · DIN 2.4602 · NiCr21Mo14W

Developed as an upgrade to C276 for oxidizing environments. C22 raises chromium to 20–22.5% while reducing tungsten, giving markedly better resistance in oxidizing acids such as nitric acid. Its versatility makes it the common choice for chemical plants handling multiple process streams and environments where the oxidizing/reducing balance is uncertain or variable throughout the production cycle.

→ Best for oxidizing media & mixed process streams
03

Chemical Composition Comparison

Three elements drive the performance differences: chromium (oxidizing resistance), molybdenum (reducing acid resistance), and copper (unique to C2000, supercharging sulfuric and hydrochloric acid resistance).

Table 1 — Chemical Composition: Hastelloy C2000 vs C276 vs C22 (per ASTM B574 / B575 / AMS specifications)
Element C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022) Role in Corrosion Resistance
Nickel (Ni) Balance (~59%) Balance (~57%) Balance (~56%) Base metal; overall corrosion resistance and ductility
Chromium (Cr) 22.0 – 24.0% ✦ 14.5 – 16.5% 20.0 – 22.5% Oxidizing environment & oxidizing acid resistance
Molybdenum (Mo) 15.0 – 17.0% ✦ 15.0 – 17.0% ✦ 12.5 – 14.5% Reducing acid & localized corrosion resistance
Copper (Cu) 1.3 – 1.9% ✦ (unique) ≤ 0.50% ≤ 0.50% Concentrated H₂SO₄ & HCl resistance — only in C2000
Tungsten (W) Not present 3.0 – 4.5% 2.5 – 3.5% Supplements Mo in reducing resistance; aids localized corrosion
Iron (Fe) 3.0 max 4.0 – 7.0% 2.0 – 6.0% Controlled impurity; minimized for best corrosion performance
Carbon (C) 0.010 max 0.010 max 0.015 max Ultra-low carbon prevents carbide precipitation during welding
Silicon (Si) 0.08 max 0.08 max 0.08 max Controlled impurity
💡
The Copper Differentiator

The 1.3–1.9% copper in C2000 is the entire rationale for the alloy's existence. Neither C276 nor C22 contains meaningful copper. In Ni-Mo-Cr alloys without copper, there is a performance gap in concentrated sulfuric acid above ~65% concentration, where the corrosion mechanism shifts and molybdenum alone is insufficient. Copper fills this gap precisely — making C2000 the only standard Hastelloy C-grade that performs well across the full H₂SO₄ concentration range from dilute to 98% concentrated.

04

Corrosion Resistance: Head-to-Head Data

Corrosion rate data is the engineer's primary tool for alloy selection. The figures below compare published data for all three alloys in the most industrially relevant acid systems. Rates below 0.127 mm/year (5 mpy) are generally acceptable for industrial process equipment.

Performance in Sulfuric Acid (H₂SO₄)

Sulfuric acid is the world's most produced industrial chemical. Its corrosivity varies strongly with both concentration and temperature — and this is precisely where C2000's copper addition creates a visible, measurable advantage.

Table 2 — Corrosion rates in H₂SO₄ at boiling point (mm/year). Source: Haynes International published data. For guidance only.
H₂SO₄ Concentration C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022) Best Alloy
10%, boiling 0.127 0.330 0.280 C2000
20%, boiling 0.254 0.480 0.420 C2000
40%, boiling 0.381 0.760 0.610 C2000
60%, boiling 0.508 0.890 0.730 C2000
80%, boiling 0.254 0.380 0.310 C2000
96% (concentrated), boiling 0.051 0.120 0.085 C2000

10% H₂SO₄ at Boiling — Corrosion Rate

C2000
0.127 mm/yr
C22
0.280 mm/yr
C276
0.330 mm/yr

Lower bar = better. C2000 corrodes 2.6× slower than C276.

40% H₂SO₄ at Boiling — Corrosion Rate

C2000
0.381 mm/yr
C22
0.610 mm/yr
C276
0.760 mm/yr

Lower bar = better. C2000 corrodes 2× slower than C276.

Need C2000 forgings for a corrosive chemical application? See forging sizes, delivery standards, and full corrosion data on the Hastelloy C2000 forging specifications page.

Performance in Hydrochloric Acid (HCl)

Hydrochloric acid is among the most aggressively corrosive environments for metallic materials. All three alloys show good resistance in dilute HCl, but the gap widens significantly at higher concentrations and temperatures.

Table 3 — Corrosion rates in HCl at 50 °C (122 °F) (mm/year). Source: Haynes International published data. For guidance only.
HCl Concentration C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022) Best Alloy
1% HCl, 50 °C < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 All equivalent
5% HCl, 50 °C 0.051 0.076 0.102 C2000
10% HCl, 50 °C 0.076 0.127 0.200 C2000
20% HCl, 50 °C 0.127 0.200 0.355 C2000
37% HCl (conc.), 20 °C 0.076 0.102 0.165 C2000
⚠️
Critical: C22 Performs Worst in HCl

C22 performs notably worse than both C2000 and C276 in hydrochloric acid. Its higher chromium content, while beneficial in oxidizing environments, does not help in this strongly reducing acid system. C22's lower molybdenum (12.5–14.5%) is the root cause. If HCl resistance is a key requirement, do not specify C22 — use C2000 first, or C276 as a second choice.

Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN)

PREN quantifies theoretical resistance to pitting corrosion in chloride-containing media:

PREN = %Cr + 3.3 × %Mo + 16 × %N

C2000 / N06200
75.8
Highest pitting resistance
of the three alloys
C276 / N10276
68.3
Excellent — second highest
due to Mo + W combination
C22 / N06022
65.6
Excellent — oxidizing acid
resistance compensates

All three alloys have PREN values far exceeding super-austenitic stainless steels (316L ≈ 24; 6Mo ≈ 42–47), confirming suitability for severe chloride environments. C2000's higher PREN comes from its higher chromium, despite equal molybdenum to C276.

05

Mechanical Properties

In most corrosion-critical applications, mechanical properties are secondary — all three alloys exceed requirements for the vast majority of chemical processing and oil & gas applications. However, engineers specifying for HPHT service need to understand elevated-temperature differences.

Table 4 — Mechanical Properties Comparison (solution-annealed, room temperature)
Property C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022)
Tensile Strength (UTS) 752 MPa (109 ksi) 790 MPa (115 ksi) 759 MPa (110 ksi)
Yield Strength (0.2%) 345 MPa (50 ksi) 355 MPa (52 ksi) 359 MPa (52 ksi)
Elongation at Break 62% 60% 62%
Brinell Hardness ≤ 220 HB ≤ 230 HB ≤ 220 HB
Density 8.50 g/cm³ (lightest) 8.89 g/cm³ 8.69 g/cm³
Max Service Temperature 650 °C (1,202 °F) 650 °C (1,202 °F) 650 °C (1,202 °F)
Magnetic Permeability 1.0002 (lowest — non-magnetic) 1.0010 1.0008

The mechanical properties of all three alloys are very close. C276 is marginally stronger at room temperature due to higher iron content and tungsten additions — rarely engineering-significant. C2000's lower density can be a minor advantage for large rotating components. Its exceptionally low magnetic permeability makes it the preferred choice for MRI-adjacent equipment and marine electromagnetic sensor housings.

06

Weldability & Fabrication

All three alloys are weldable using standard nickel alloy practices. However, filler metal selection, interpass temperature limits, and contamination protocols differ in ways that affect fabrication cost and quality.

Table 5 — Weldability Comparison: C2000 vs C276 vs C22
Parameter C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022)
Preferred GTAW Filler ERNiCrMo-17 (matching) ERNiCrMo-4 (matching) ERNiCrMo-10 (matching)
Acceptable Alternate Filler ERNiCrMo-10 (C22 wire) ERNiCrMo-10 (C22 wire) ERNiCrMo-4 (C276 wire)
Preheat Required (≤ 50 mm) None None None
Max Interpass Temperature 150 °C (stricter) 175 °C (300 °F) 175 °C (300 °F)
PWHT Required (typical) Not required (optional for critical) Not required Not required
Hot Cracking Sensitivity Moderate — sulfur contamination risk Low–moderate Low–moderate
Filler Metal Availability Good (fewer mills than C276) Excellent (widest global stock) Good
⚠️
C2000 Sulfur Contamination Warning

Hastelloy C2000 is particularly sensitive to hot cracking from sulfur contamination during welding — more so than C276 or C22. All tools, fixtures, and work surfaces must be completely free from sulfur-containing compounds, oils, greases, and marking materials. This is a common cause of weld rejection during fabrication inspection and adds a process-discipline requirement that shops experienced only with C276 may overlook.

07

Cost & Availability

All three alloys are premium materials priced several times higher than stainless steel grades. The relative cost relationships below reflect 2025–2026 market conditions.

Table 6 — Relative Cost & Availability (indicative, 2025–2026)
Factor C2000 (N06200) C276 (N10276) C22 (N06022)
Relative Material Cost Premium (+10–20% over C276) Benchmark (lowest) +5–12% over C276
Global Mill Availability Good (fewer stocking mills) Excellent (most widely stocked) Good
Standard Mill Lead Time 8–14 weeks 4–10 weeks 6–12 weeks
Forging Lead Time (Jiangsu Liangyi) 4–8 weeks 4–8 weeks 4–8 weeks
Life Cycle Cost in H₂SO₄ Service Lowest — longest service life Higher — corrodes faster in H₂SO₄ Higher — corrodes faster in H₂SO₄
💡
Total Cost of Ownership vs. Purchase Price

A real-world example: 316L stainless steel components in a 98% H₂SO₄ plant were replaced every 8–12 months. Switching to C276 extended service life to approximately 24–30 months. Switching to C2000 extended service life to over 6 years — reducing total cost of ownership (including downtime, replacement parts, and labor) by more than 60% over a 10-year operating horizon. Paying 15–20% more for C2000 over C276 is routinely justified in sulfuric acid service.

08

Application Scenarios: Which Alloy Wins Where?

The most useful alloy selection guide translates data into real scenarios. Below are six specific application scenarios with clear, defensible recommendations.

Chemical Processing

Sulfuric Acid Plant — Pumps, Valves, Reactor Vessels

For equipment handling H₂SO₄ across any concentration from 10% to 98%, particularly at elevated temperatures, C2000 is the clear choice. Its copper content suppresses corrosion at concentrations where C276 and C22 corrode 2–4× faster. Both pump casings and valve bodies benefit from the superior fatigue and erosion-corrosion resistance of C2000 forgings versus cast alternatives.

→ Specify C2000 (UNS N06200)
Oil & Gas — HPHT Sour Service

Wellhead Equipment & Christmas Tree Components (NACE MR0175)

For downhole and wellhead equipment in H₂S-containing (sour) service with high-chloride brine, C276 remains the most widely specified alloy under NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156. Its decades-long track record in HPHT wellhead service, broad API 6A acceptance, and excellent SSC resistance make it the lower-risk procurement choice. C2000 is also acceptable and preferred when sulfuric acid contamination is additionally present.

→ Specify C276 (UNS N10276)
Chemical Processing

Mixed Oxidizing / Reducing Process Streams

When process chemistry alternates between oxidizing and reducing conditions — reactors handling mixed acids containing both nitric acid and HCl, or environments with variable ferric ion content — C22 is specifically designed for this service. Its higher chromium gives markedly better performance during oxidizing phases, while molybdenum protects during reducing phases better than chromium-rich stainless steels.

→ Specify C22 (UNS N06022)
Pharmaceutical & Biotech

API Manufacturing Reactors and Heat Exchangers

Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing uses a wide range of aggressive solvents, acids, and alkaline solutions. C2000's superior corrosion resistance across both acidic and alkaline environments, non-leaching behavior (critical for product purity), and excellent cleanability make it the premium material for API reactors. The higher cost relative to C276 is easily justified by batch-loss prevention and regulatory compliance.

→ Specify C2000 (UNS N06200)
Pulp & Paper

Chlorine Dioxide Bleaching Equipment

Pulp and paper bleaching environments expose equipment to ClO₂, Cl₂, NaOCl, and residual sulfuric acid in high-chloride aqueous solutions. C276 has decades of proven performance in this environment and remains the standard specification for digesters, washers, and bleaching equipment. The tungsten addition in C276 is particularly beneficial in environments with fluctuating oxidizing chlorine species.

→ Specify C276 (UNS N10276)
Environmental Engineering

Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Scrubbers

FGD systems expose equipment to a corrosive mix of H₂SO₄ aerosols, HCl, HF, and chloride-saturated scrubbing slurries at temperatures up to 90 °C. C22's superior resistance to oxidizing conditions and wet chloride environments makes it a strong candidate. C2000 is equally appropriate and may offer advantages where HCl content is the dominant corrosive species. Both significantly outperform C276 in highly oxidizing FGD conditions.

→ Specify C22 or C2000
09

Quick-Reference Decision Matrix

Use this matrix to assess which alloy best fits your specific service conditions at a glance.

Alloy Selection Decision Matrix Service Condition vs. Alloy Fit
Service Condition
C2000
C276
C22
Concentrated H₂SO₄ (>40%) at elevated temperature
Dilute HCl (<10%) at moderate temperature
Concentrated HCl (>20%) at elevated temperature
Oxidizing acids (nitric acid, mixed acid)
H₂S sour service (NACE MR0175 / API 6A)
High chloride / seawater pitting resistance
Mixed oxidizing / reducing process streams
Chlorine / hypochlorite bleaching environments
Non-magnetic requirement (MRI, sensing instruments)
Pharmaceutical / food-grade non-leaching service
Lowest unit purchase price is top priority
Widest global filler metal / consumable availability

Strong fit   Acceptable, not optimal   Not preferred

10

Final Verdict: The Decision Framework

C2000

Choose Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200) when:

Your process involves sulfuric acid at any concentration, hydrochloric acid at elevated temperature or concentration, mixed acid environments with both oxidizing and reducing components, pharmaceutical or food-grade service requiring non-leaching materials, or any application where you need the broadest single-alloy corrosion resistance envelope. C2000's copper addition is a genuine performance differentiator that neither C276 nor C22 can replicate. For full technical data — chemical composition, mechanical properties, corrosion tables, and available forging sizes — see the Hastelloy C2000 forged parts specifications.

C276

Choose Hastelloy C276 (UNS N10276) when:

Your primary corrosive threats are reducing conditions, high-chloride environments without strong oxidizers, H₂S-containing sour gas service under NACE MR0175, pulp and paper bleaching environments, or when maximum global supply chain availability and the lowest unit cost among the three alloys is a procurement priority. C276 is the world's most used and best-understood corrosion-resistant nickel alloy — its track record in demanding service is unmatched.

C22

Choose Hastelloy C22 (UNS N06022) when:

Your environment alternates between oxidizing and reducing conditions, oxidizing acids such as nitric acid are a significant process stream component, for FGD systems and incineration plants where multi-acid oxidizing gas mixtures are present, or when you need better oxidizing environment performance than C276 provides without the sulfuric acid-specific advantages of C2000.

11

Frequently Asked Questions

A C22 filler wire (ERNiCrMo-10) is the preferred substitute when matching C2000 filler (ERNiCrMo-17) is unavailable. C22 filler provides better oxidizing environment protection than C276 filler while maintaining adequate reducing resistance. C276 filler (ERNiCrMo-4) can be used for less critical applications, but weld metal performance in concentrated H₂SO₄ or HCl will be reduced. For critical process equipment, always use matching C2000 filler.
Yes. Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200) is a qualified material under NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156 for use in H₂S-containing oil and gas environments, subject to applicable hardness and composition requirements. However, C276 has a longer track record in API 6A wellhead applications and is more frequently specified in upstream oil & gas procurement standards. Both alloys are technically acceptable; C276 may require fewer qualification discussions with end-users.
Hydrochloric acid is a reducing acid. In reducing environments, molybdenum content is the primary protective mechanism. C22 has lower molybdenum (12.5–14.5%) than both C2000 and C276 (15–17% each). Additionally, C22's higher chromium content — while beneficial in oxidizing conditions — provides minimal benefit in HCl, where chromium is not the rate-controlling factor. The combination of lower Mo and absent copper makes C22 measurably less resistant to HCl than either C2000 or C276.
For a process alternating between sulfuric acid (reducing) and nitric acid (strongly oxidizing), C2000 is the strongest single-alloy recommendation. Its high chromium (22–24%) protects well in nitric acid, while its copper addition provides the needed sulfuric acid resistance. C22 is a close second for this service due to its optimized balance for mixed environments, but C22 may corrode more rapidly during the sulfuric acid phases compared to C2000.
Yes. For environments dominated by hydrochloric acid at all concentrations, Hastelloy B-3 (UNS N10675) — a nickel-molybdenum alloy without significant chromium — offers better HCl resistance than C2000, C276, or C22 in purely reducing HCl service. However, Hastelloy B-3 performs very poorly in oxidizing environments and cannot be used where even trace amounts of ferric ions, dissolved oxygen, or oxidizing acids are present.
Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited manufactures open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings in all three alloys from its Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China facility. ISO 9001:2015 certified. Producing to ASTM B564, ASME SB-564, API 6A, NACE MR0175, and EN 10204 3.1/3.2 standards. For full specifications and a 24-hour quotation response, contact the engineering team at sales@jnmtforgedparts.com or +86-13585067993.

Need Hastelloy C2000, C276, or C22 Forgings?

Jiangsu Liangyi manufactures open-die forgings and seamless rolled rings in all three alloys. ISO 9001:2015 certified. Exporting to 50+ countries since 1997. Sizes from 30 kg to 30 tons.

Request Your 24-Hour Quotation →

No commitment required  ·  EN 10204 3.1 MTC included as standard  ·  API 6A / NACE MR0175 / ASME available per customer order

Related Resources

Key Questions: Hastelloy C2000 vs C276 vs C22

What is the main difference between Hastelloy C2000 and Hastelloy C276?

The main difference between Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200) and Hastelloy C276 (UNS N10276) is the presence of 1.3–1.9% copper in C2000, which is completely absent in C276. This copper addition makes C2000 2–4× more resistant to sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid than C276. C2000 also has higher chromium (22–24% vs 14.5–16.5%), giving it better oxidizing environment resistance. C276, in turn, adds 3–4.5% tungsten which C2000 lacks, and is the better choice for reducing environments, sour gas service under NACE MR0175, and applications where global supply chain availability is critical. C2000's PREN is ~75.8 versus C276's ~68.3.

Why does Hastelloy C2000 outperform C276 and C22 in sulfuric acid?

Hastelloy C2000 outperforms C276 and C22 in sulfuric acid because of its unique 1.3–1.9% copper addition. In non-oxidizing acids like H₂SO₄, copper in a nickel matrix lowers the corrosion potential and significantly reduces the dissolution rate of the alloy. At concentrations above ~65% H₂SO₄, molybdenum alone (the primary protection mechanism in C276 and C22) becomes less effective, but copper maintains protection across the full 10–98% concentration range. Published data from Haynes International shows C2000 corroding at 0.051 mm/year in 96% H₂SO₄ at boiling point, compared to 0.120 mm/year for C276 and 0.085 mm/year for C22 — making C2000 up to 2.4× more resistant.

When should you choose Hastelloy C22 over C2000 and C276?

Choose Hastelloy C22 (UNS N06022) over C2000 and C276 when your process environment alternates between oxidizing and reducing conditions, or when nitric acid (HNO₃) is a significant component of the process stream. C22's chromium content of 20–22.5% is optimized for oxidizing acid resistance, while its 12.5–14.5% molybdenum provides moderate reducing environment protection. C22 is the standard specification for flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubbers, waste incineration plants, mixed acid systems containing both nitric and hydrochloric acid, and chemical plants where the oxidizing/reducing balance of process streams is variable or unpredictable. However, if HCl or H₂SO₄ dominates the corrosive environment, C2000 or C276 will outperform C22.

How do the costs of Hastelloy C2000, C276, and C22 compare?

Among the three alloys, Hastelloy C276 (UNS N10276) is the benchmark lowest-cost option and the most widely stocked globally, with typical mill lead times of 4–10 weeks. Hastelloy C22 (UNS N06022) typically costs 5–12% more than C276. Hastelloy C2000 (UNS N06200) carries a 10–20% premium over C276 due to copper content and fewer producing mills, with lead times of 8–14 weeks from most mills. However, on a total cost of ownership basis in sulfuric acid service, C2000 is often the least expensive choice: it delivers 6+ year service life versus 8–12 months for 316L SS or 24–30 months for C276, reducing total equipment and maintenance costs by over 60% over a 10-year plant life. Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited offers all three alloys with 4–8 week forging lead times and 24-hour quotation response.

About this guide: Authored by the engineering team at Jiangsu Liangyi Co., Limited, ISO 9001:2015 certified manufacturer of Hastelloy C2000, C276, and C22 forgings since 1997. Corrosion data referenced from Haynes International published datasheets. All values are for solution-annealed material. Published: June 15, 2026.
Contact us:sales@jnmtforgedparts.com  ·  📞 +86-13585067993 (Phone / WhatsApp)  ·  🌐 www.jnmtforgedparts.com  ·  📍 Chengchang Industry Park, Jiangyin City, Jiangsu Province, China